FCC Vote WT-17-79 Transcript

From The FCC Live Stream

Warning: Massive Federal Overreach Committted by the FCC This Morning . . .

Previous Statement by U.S. Conference of Mayors CEO and Executive Director Tom Cochran on recent FCC proposals diminishing local government ownership rights over local rights-of-way and other public property:

“The U.S. Conference of Mayors strongly opposes recent proposals by the Federal Communications Commission to grant communications service providers subsidized access to local public property and to dictate how local governments manage their own local rights-of-ways and public property. This unprecedented federal intrusion into local (and state) government property rights will have substantial adverse impacts on cities and their taxpayers, including reduced funding for essential local government services, as well as an increased risk of right-of-way and other public safety hazards.

We believe the courts will conclude that FCC’s proposals are based on misguided interpretations of federal law. Congress previously addressed and resolved these issues resoundingly in favor of local and state governments and their property rights. The Conference and its member cities reject efforts by this unelected federal regulatory agency to improperly invade state and local government authority by compelling local elected officials to subsidize, or ‘gift’, local public property to a small, favored group of private businesses. According to FCC’s own estimates, just one of these actions — the proposed small cell rules — threatens future revenues to local (and state) governments by billions of dollars over the next decade.

The Conference of Mayors strongly opposes these proposals and calls on the agency to change them; absent such changes, the Conference and its members will seek relief in federal court to overturn this unprecedented overreach by the FCC.”

SECRETARY: THE THIRD ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS PRESENTED BY THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU AND IS ACCELERATING WIRELESS BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT BY REMOVING BARRIERS TO INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT. ACCELERATING WIRE LIN BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT DEPLOYMENT. CHIEF OF THE BUREAU WILL GIVE THE INTRODUCTION.

CHAIRMAN PAI: IF YOUR TEAM IS READY THE FLOOR IS YOURS.

>> GOOD MORNING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. I’M PLEASED TO PRESENT A DECLARATORY RULING AND THIRD REPORT IN ORDER AND COMMISSION’S ACCELERATING WIRELESS BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT BY REMOVING BARRIERS TO INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT PROCEEDING. I’M JOINED AT THE TABLE BY STPHFRPLT LISTING NAMES]

AND ADDS TO THE STAFF AT THE TABLE I WOULD LIKE TO THANK EVERYONE LISTED ON THE SLIDE FOR THEIR WORK ON ITEM. DARRELL WILL NOW PRESENT THE ITEM.

>> GOOD MORNING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. WE PRESENT TO YOU TODAY A DECLARATORY RULING FOR STATE AND LOCAL IMPEDIMENTS TO EMPLOYMENT OF 5 G AND OTHER SERVICES. IT WILL REAFFIRM THE CALIFORNIA STANDARD FOR SPWRPT BEING SECTIONS 253 AND 332 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT. UNDER THAT STANDARD A STATE OR LOCAL REQUIREMENT CONSTITUTES AN EFFECTIVE PROHIBITION VIOLATIVE OF 253 AND 332 IF IT MATERIALLY LIMITS OR INHIBITS THE ABILITY OF ANY COMPETITOR OR POTENTIAL COMPETITOR TO COMPETE IN A FAIR AND BALANCED LEGAL AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT. THE DECLARATORY RULING WOULD CLARIFY THE STATE AND LOCAL FEE AND OTHER CHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH DEPLOYMENT OF WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ARE CONSISTENT WITH SECTIONS 253 AND 332 ONLY IF THEY ARE A REASONABLE APPROXIMATION OF THE STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT COST AND COST FACTORED INTO THE FEES ARE OBJECTIVELY REASONABLE AND FEES ARE NO HIGHER THAN THE FEES CHARGED SIMILAR SITUATED COMPETITORS IN SIMILAR SITUATIONS. THE DECLARATORY RULING WOULD PROVIDE GUIDANCE ON THE APPLICATIONS OF THIS STANDARD IT OTHER STATE AND LOCAL RESTRICTIONS INCLUDING UNDERGROUND REQUIREMENTS MENT MENT IT WITH ESTABLISH 332 SHOT CLOCKS FOR STATE AND LOCAL REVIEW OF SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES APPLICATIONS. SPECIFICALLY IT WOULD ESTABLISH A SHOT CLOCK FOR SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES. DUE TO THE SHORTENED SHOT CLOCK TIME FRAMES LOCAL AUTHORITIES WOULD BE ABLE TO RESTART THE SHOT CLOCKS IF THEY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT OF MATERIAL DEFICIENCY IN THE APPLICATION WITHIN 10 DAYS. THE REPORTING ORDER WITH CODIFY THE EXISTING SHOT CLOCKS THAT THE COMMISSION ESTABLISHED IN 2009 AND ESTABLISHED A NEW REMEDY AVAILABLE IT APPLICANTS WHEN AUTHORITIES FAIL IT ACT IN THE NEW 332 SHOT CLOCKS. THE THIRD POINT WITH CONCLUDE THE SHOT CLOCKS APPLY TO ALL AUTHORIZATIONS NECESSARY FOR THE DEPHREULTLOYMENT OF SERVICES AND FOR APPLICATIONS IS THE SAME AS IF THE APPLICATIONS WILL BEEN SUBMITTED INDIVIDUALLY. COLLECTIVELY THE MEASURES IN THERE RULING AND ORDER WOULD ELIMINATE REGULATORY BARRIERS THIS UNLAWFULLY INHIBIT THE DEPLOYMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE NECESSARY TO SUPPORT ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES AND WOULD ESTABLISH PROCEDURES THAT WITH EXPEDITE THE DEPLOYMENT OF WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ACROSS THE NATION. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU RECOMMENDS ADOPTION AND REQUESTS EDITORIAL PRIVILEGES TO MAKE TECHNICAL OR CONFORMING EDITS.

CHAIRMAN PAI: THANK YOU FOR THAT PRESENTATION. IS THIS YOUR FIRST TIME PRESENT PRESENTING?

>> SECOND.

CHAIRMAN PAI: WELL DONE. COMMENTS FROM THE BENCH.

Continue reading “FCC Vote WT-17-79 Transcript”

The Real Race is to Serve All Americans

Adapted from an article by Tom Wheeler September 25, 2018; Original article here

September 28 will see a White House rally to promote U.S. leadership in fifth generation (5G) wireless technology. I was part of a similar event at the Clinton White House in 1993 that promoted the importance of making more spectrum available through auctions that were then being considered by Congress. This time around, it looks like the messaging will be around the “5G race” between the United States and China

Wireless Industry groups warn that the U.S. is in third place behind China and South Korea when it comes to 5G. The so-called “5G gap” has become the go-to rationale for all kinds of industry-sought policy changes. Judging by how the issue is framed, the U.S. is on the verge of losing the “5G race” to China.

  • T-Mobile and Sprint warn that the U.S. will lose the 5G race if the companies are not allowed to merge (while announcing their own non-merged 5G deployment plans).

  • The Trump Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has used the race to justify extending Washington’s regulatory reach down to telling local governments how to do zoning for antenna siting (this from the “deregulatory” administration).

  • Satellite operators such as Intelsat, whose C-Band transmission business has atrophied, have discovered they can recast their licenses as “5G spectrum”. The satellite companies are asking the Trump FCC for permission to conduct a private auction that would allow them to reap a potential monetary windfall instead of U.S. taxpayers.

It is time to take a deep breath and let logic temper emotional battle cries and political gamesmanship. We need to spend less time worrying about China and more time asking how we can race to make broadband work for all Americans.

Continue reading “The Real Race is to Serve All Americans”

30+ FCC Actions in 2017-2018 Eliminate States Rights and Consumer Protections

By Bruce Kushnick. Sept 25, 2018; Original article here

Legend

  • WT Docket 15-180: Revising the Historic Preservation Review Process for Wireless Facility Deployments
  • WT Docket 17-79: Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment
  • WC Docket 17-84: Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment
  • WTB = Wireline Telecommunications Bureau
  • WCB = Wireline Competition Bureau

FCC Actions for Proceeding WT Docket 17-79

Num Division Item Date Form
1 WTB: opens WT Docket 17-79 Docs 3/30/17 PUB NOTICE
2 Chairman Pai: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry – WT Docket 17-79 and 15-180 Docs 3/30/17 OTHER
3 WTB: Press release for WT Docket 17-79 Docs 4/20/17 OTHER
4 WTB: FCC-17-38 – Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry for WT Docket 17-79 (Streamlining State and Local Review; Reexamining National Historic Preservation Act and National Environmental Policy Act) Docs 4/21/17 NPRM
5 WTB announce webinars to examine regulatory impediments to wireless network infrastructure investment and deployment; re: WT Docket 17-79 Docs 5/11/17 PUB NOTICE
6 WTB announces webinars that will examine the regulatory impediments to wireless network infrastructure, including impediments associated with the Commission’s National Historic Preservation Act Docs 5/11/17 PUB NOTICE
7 WTB: DA 17-525 – deadlines for filing comments in response to the NPRM and NOI in WT Docket 17-79 are extended to 6/15/17 and 7/7/17, respectively. Docs 5/26/17 ORDER
8 WTB: DA 17-669 – Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments for WT Dockets 17-79 and 17-84 is DENIED. Docs 7/13/17 ORDER
9 WTB: FCC 17-153 – Press release for Order that eliminates historic preservation review when a pole is replaced with a substantially identical pole; for WT Docket 17-79 Docs 11/16/17 OTHER
10 WTB: FCC 17-153 – exclusion for
Pole Replacements that won’t affect historic properties; Amendments and reorganization of historic preservation rules.
Docs 11/17/17 R&O
11 WTB: FCC 17-165 – Press release for order that allows collocations on Twilight Towers without historic preservation review; re: WT Docket 17-79 Docs 12/14/17 OTHER
12 WTB: FCC 17-165 – Call for Comment on a solution for so-called “Twilight Towers,” which, if adopted, would create a new exclusion from routine historic preservation review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Docs 12/14/17 PUB NOTICE
13 WTB: FCC 18-30 – Press release for order that excludes small wireless facilities deployed on non-Tribal lands from National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review; re: WT Docket 17-79 Doc 3/22/18 OTHER
14 WTB: FCC 18-30 – order that Excludes Small Wireless Facilities From NHPA and NEPA Review; Streamlines NHPA and NEPA Review for Large Wireless Facilities; re: WT Docket 17-79 Docs 3/30/18 R&O
15 Communications Business Opportunities: FCC 17-153/DA 18-458 – Small Business Compliance Guide re: WT Docket 17-79. The Report and Order created an exemption from historic preservation review, for the replacement of utility poles that will support communications antennas. Doc 5/3/18 OTHER
16 WTB: DA 18-675 – changes that are being made to implement the Commission’s 2018 Infrastructure Second Report and Order, which was released on 3/30/18; re: WT Docket No. 17-79 Doc 7/2/18 PUB NOTICE
17 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau: Eight Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed by 6/11/17 in matter of WT Docket 17-79 Doc 7/24/18 PUB NOTICE
18 WTB & WCB: FCC 18-111 – Press release for one-touch, make-ready rules for utility poles re: WT Docket 17-79; WC Docket 17-84 Docs 8/2/18 OTHER
19 WTB & WCB: FCC 18-111 – Third Report and Order and Declaratory Ruling for new one-touch, make-ready pole attachment process Docs 8/3/18 R&O
20 Office of General Counsel: FCC 18-111 – the FCC received many comments from the public; like the listed comments, they will be associated with, but not made part of, the record re: WT Docket 17-79; WC Docket 17-84. Doc 8/17/18 PUB NOTICE

Continue reading “30+ FCC Actions in 2017-2018 Eliminate States Rights and Consumer Protections”

Nine US House Members Oppose FCC Action That Harms Consumers

Rep. McNerney Leads Letter Urging FCC to Delay Vote Undermining Communities’ Ability to Meet Needs of Residents

By Jerry McNerney Sep 25, 2018 Press Release here

Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Jerry McNerney (CA-09), along with eight Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai, requesting the proposed Streamlining Deployment of Next Generation Wireless Infrastructure Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order be removed from tomorrow’s Open Meeting agenda.

The letter was also signed by

  1. Congressman Mike Doyle (PA-14)
  2. Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ-06)
  3. Congressman Eliot Engle (NY-16)
  4. Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (MI-12)
  5. Congresswoman Yvette Clarke (NY-09)
  6. Congressman Peter Welch (VT-At-Large)
  7. Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (CA-18)
  8. Congressman John Sarbanes (MD-03)

The letter reads:

"Dear Chairman Pai:

We support swift deployment of 5G and are concerned that the proposed Streamlining Deployment of Next Generation Wireless Infrastructure Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order (“Declaratory Ruling and Order”) will set us on a path that will ultimately delay 5G efforts. Many cities and counties of varying sizes across the country have spoken out against this proposal and urged the Commission to cooperatively address key concerns so as to avoid harm to consumers and localities. Given the reasons outlined below, we ask that you remove the item from the Open Meeting agenda and take the time needed to resolve these issues. Thoughtful consideration now will benefit consumers and avoid unnecessary delays that may result from future litigation.

We are excited about the opportunities that 5G will bring—including its potential to increase broadband connectivity, transform health care and transportation, and make our power grids more efficient — and we are eager to see 5G deployed. However, in order to achieve the best outcome for consumers, it is crucial that 5G be deployed in a way that carefully balances the interests of both communities and the wireless carriers. The Declaratory Ruling and Order clearly falls short of striking such a balance.

Continue reading “Nine US House Members Oppose FCC Action That Harms Consumers”

5G Wireless Is Not Profitable When the Cross-Subsidies Stop

By Bruce Kushnick, Sept 23, 2018; Original article here.

Cross Subsidies from Your State’s Wired, State-Based Telecom Utility to Separate Private Wireless Companies Have Been Floating this Wireless Expansion For a Long Time — this must end,

On September, 26, 2018, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr will present a plan for deploying 5G, which claims that rural areas will benefit and that federal actions are needed to help create billions in investments.

“And yet still too many communities, especially in rural America, feel that they may be left behind. Their elected leaders have called on the FCC to act because they are concerned that, without federal action, they may not see 4G, let alone 5G service. They worry that the billions of dollars of investment needed to deploy next-gen networks will be consumed by high fees and long delays in big, ‘must serve’ cities.”

Continue reading “5G Wireless Is Not Profitable When the Cross-Subsidies Stop”

BDAC Reps Report that Municipal Input Was Brushed Aside by the FCC

By Leslie Stimson, Sept 21, 2018, | Original Inside Towers article here

Two municipal representatives on the FCC’s Broadband Deployment Advisory Committee say localities’ concerns were brushed aside as the FCC prepared the small cells siting streamlining item, to be voted on next week.

Debbi Goldman, the representative for Communications Workers of America on the BDAC’s Model Code for Municipalities Working Group, in a filing this week, calls the draft order

  • Is “inconsistent” with the working group’s recommendations
  • Is an "overreach of federal authority

The proposal sets “presumptively reasonable” siting costs at $270 per year per site, according to Goldman, who adds the working group didn’t reach a conclusion about fees because “of a lack of agreement.”

Goldman writes:

“The draft order ignores our work, choosing instead to further the interests of the wireless industry over that of the public,”

Continue reading “BDAC Reps Report that Municipal Input Was Brushed Aside by the FCC”

Major US Cities Revolt Against FCC Small Cell Deployment Rules

by Mike Dano, Sept 21, 2018 | Original Fierce Wireless article here.

A large number of U.S. cities, both big and small, voiced concerted and coordinated opposition to the FCC’s proposal to streamline the deployment of small cells across the country.

At the center of the issue is the federal government’s attempts to override local government control over the installation of wireless equipment like small cells in neighborhoods around the country. The FCC essentially argues that some state and city rules are unnecessarily impeding the deployment of wireless infrastructure, including 5G. But a large number of U.S. cities are fighting back against that argument — contending that they should remain in charge of the costs and timelines associated with small cell deployments.

Cities speaking up on the issue range from Philadelphia to San Francisco to Chicago to Lakewood, California, and Yuma, Arizona. The filings by the cities generally follow the same format and present the same basic arguments:

  • The FCC’s proposed new collocation shot clock category “is too extreme.”
  • The FCC’s proposed definition of “effective prohibition” is overly broad.
  • The FCC’s proposed recurring fee structure is an “unreasonable overreach that will harm local policy innovation,” and the fees are not “fair and reasonable” compensation.

Continue reading “Major US Cities Revolt Against FCC Small Cell Deployment Rules”

FCC Ex Parte Comment for WT Docket 17-79

September 17, 2018

Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street SW
Washington, District of Columbia 20554

RE: Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, WC Docket No. 17-84; Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, WT Docket No. 17-79

Dear Ms. Dortch,

As director of Maryland Smart Meter Awareness (MSMA) and as researcher and creator of https://www.whatis5g.info, I would like to add to the record MSMA’s strong opposition to the Order Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, which represents a complete reversal of FCC’s mandate to regulate the wireless industry and replaces it with an Order that instead regulates the public and local municipalities.

As stated in my original comments, the vast majority of people still don’t know what 5G is; don’t know that wireless radiation emitting antennas will be placed in front of homes throughout the US; and remain uninformed about the adverse health impacts of wireless radiation. Without this knowledge, there can be no due process.

Wireless antennas in residential areas will impact the health, safety, and quality of life of us all so profoundly that to vote through this Order without adequate public understanding and input would be a clear violation of our rights. At the very least, the Commission should postpone this vote until November to allow sufficient time for the public to review and comment on the 100-page Docket.

The densification of our communities with wireless “small cells”, the Internet of Things, “Smart” Cities, and whatever other applications industry dreams up, would render public spaces inaccessible to people with Electromagnetic Sensitivity (EMS), and some may even be forced from their homes. Would anywhere be left safe for them? It would appear that forced densification of communities with radiation emitting towers would present a clear ADA violation.

Continue reading “FCC Ex Parte Comment for WT Docket 17-79”

ADA Rights Ignored in FCC WT Docket 17-79

From https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?q=filers.name:(Merry%20Callahan)&sort=date_disseminated,DESC

June 17, 2017

Hello FCC,

Please include my comment in opposition to proceedings on the expediting and expansion of 5G networking onto public right of way and poles, and the stand-down of copper-lines in both urban and rural areas. I request that a 30-day extension to comments be granted on these proceedings, WT Dockets 17-84 & 17-79, with a 30-day extension to replies on comments.

Further, I request a moratorium on these and other expansion of networking policy recommendations by FCC until such time that evidence can be shown that these two docket items, and expansions like them when implemented, can comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and 42 U.S.C 12101 et seq.

I am an acknowledged member of the protected class with the characteristic of ‘disabled by electromagnetic sensitivities’ (EMS), which is recognized by The Access Board. https://www.access-board.gov/research/completed-research/indoor-environmental-quality/introduction.

Exposure to cellular technology violently exacerbates my genetic vertigo disease and exacerbates my life threatening upper cervical spinal column and brain stem injury and the pervasive nerve damage remaining after recovery. This effect on damaged, or amputated nerves and autonomic nervous system injury and genetic damage such as mine is well known, and is specifically referenced in appendices and testimony at the ADA’s site.

Continue reading “ADA Rights Ignored in FCC WT Docket 17-79”

Scott Wiener Paints Ajit Pai as Telecom Shill

California Net Neutrality Fight Escalates

by Dell Cameron 9/14/18 | Original Gizmodo article here,

The feud between federal Republican officials and the architects of California’s recently passed (but as of yet unsigned) net neutrality legislation intensified Friday, with State Senator Scott Wiener, the bill’s principal author, accusing the FCC of being bought and paid for by the telecom industry. Wiener, a Democrat of San Francisco, returned fire in a statement after Ajit Pai, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, referred to Wiener’s Senate Bill 822 as an “egregious” example of net neutrality proponents “pushing state governments to regulate the internet.”

FCC Chairman Ajt Pai said in a speech Friday at the Maine Heritage Policy Center

“Last month, the California state legislature passed a radical, anti-consumer Internet regulation bill that would impose restrictions even more burdensome than those adopted by the FCC in 2015. In a way, I can understand how they succumbed to the temptation to regulate. After all, I suppose a broadband pipe might look to some like a plastic straw.”

Wiener countered after the speech, saying that, unlike the FCC, California isn’t run “by the big telecom and cable companies.”

CA State Senator Scott Wiener:

“Pai can take whatever potshots at California he wants. The reality is that California is the world’s innovation capital, and unlike the crony capitalism promoted by the Trump Administration, California understands exactly what it takes to foster an open innovation economy with a level playing field,”

Continue reading “Scott Wiener Paints Ajit Pai as Telecom Shill”