2019 Accelerating Broadband Development by Empowering Local Communities Act, HR.530

Opposes the Unregulated Deployment of Densified 4G and 5G Antennas in Public Rights-of-Way

H.R.530 – To provide that certain actions by the Federal Communications Commission shall have no force or effect

Press Release January 15th, 2019 | Original here.

Update: We received the bill text for HR.530 text directly from Eshoo’s office: 2019-0114-HR-530.pdf; the text is now on the congress.gov web site and reproduced, below.



116th CONGRESS, 1st Session

H.R.530

To provide that certain actions by the Federal Communications Commission shall have no force or effect.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 14, 2019

Ms. Eshoo (for herself and Ms. Speier) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To provide that certain actions by the Federal Communications Commission shall have no force or effect.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Accelerating Broadband Development by Empowering Local Communities Act of 2019”.

SEC. 2. Preservation of rights of State and local governments.

Actions by the Federal Communications Commission in “Accelerating Wireless and Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment” (FCC 18–133 83 Fed. Reg. 51867) and the Federal Communications Commission’s Declaratory Ruling in “Third Report and Order and Declaratory Ruling” (FCC FCC 18–111) shall have no force or effect.



WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Jan 14, 2019, Congresswoman Anna G. Eshoo (CA-18) introduced H.R. 530, the Accelerating Wireless Broadband Development by Empowering Local Communities Act of 2019, legislation to overturn Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations limiting the ability of local governments to regulate the deployment of 5G wireless infrastructure.

Background

On August 2, 2018 and September 26, 2018, the FCC adopted regulations limiting the abilities of cities and states to regulate small cell sites (e.g., pole attachments) for the deployment of densified 4G and 5G infrastructure. The actions limit the type and amount of fees cities and states may charge, set “shot clocks” as low as 60 days for cities and states to authorize proposals, and limit non-fee requirements cities and states may institute. Portions of the regulations began taking effect on January 14, 2019.

The City of San Jose is leading a coalition of nearly 100 cities, towns, counties, and associations of localities in suing the FCC arguing that the FCC lacks the statutory authority to issue such regulations. The Cities of Burlingame, San Bruno, and San Francisco have also joined the City of San Jose in its lawsuit. Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA-14) joined Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-CA-18) as a cosponsor of the bill.

Anna Eshoo, US Congresswoman:.

“Having served in local government for a decade on the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, I understand and respect the important role that state and local governments play in protecting the welfare of their residents. 5G is essential for our country’s communications network and economy, but it must be deployed responsibly and equitably. The FCC let industry write these regulations without sufficient input from local leaders. This has led to regulations that restrict cities from requiring carriers to meet the needs of communities in which they want to operate.”

Nancy L. Werner, General Counsel of the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA)

“We welcome Congresswoman Eshoo’s effort to set aside the Federal Communications Commission’s actions that unnecessarily benefit one industry at the expense of our communities. They do nothing to ensure that all communities — rich, poor, urban, rural, and everything in between — will see the benefits of increased broadband deployment. Local governments have the ultimate responsibility for safeguarding their communities.”

Sam Liccardo, Mayor of San Jose (who supported veto of CA SB.649 – the CA State Small Cell Deployment Bill):

“The FCC forced Congress to act by failing to listen to reasonable input from communities across the country, cowering to industry interests, and failing to put the public interests first. This legislation will preserve the ability of local communities to negotiate fair, market-based broadband deployment agreements and close the digital divide that exists for 34 million low-income and rural Americans. We want to thank Rep. Eshoo for her leadership on this issue.”

Clarence Anthony, CEO and Executive Director of the National League of Cities (NLC):

“We applaud Congresswoman Eshoo for her leadership on behalf of local governments. Cities, towns and villages are eager to welcome new technologies like 5G, but must retain the authority to protect the diverse needs of residents and communities. Federal agencies should work more closely with local leaders to understand those needs, which the FCC’s actions failed to do.”

Matthew Chase, Executive Director of the National Association of Counties (NACo):

“Counties are committed to ensuring that all residents have access to affordable broadband while timely 5G facilities and services are deployed. As we achieve these goals, we must also fulfill our responsibilities as trustees of public property and rights-of-way, without adding unnecessary red tape. We thank Representative Eshoo for introducing a bill that preserves the role of counties and other local governments as true partners in advancing 5G technology everywhere.”