Dormant Dark Fiber All Over America
By Jason Koebler Feb 25 2016, 6:25am; Original article here
Google Fiber in San Francisco has been 15 years in the making.
For years, San Francisco has had a robust fiber optic infrastructure laying dormant underneath its streets. Google announced Wednesday that it’s going to start lighting some of those cables up. Welcome to the future of broadband in major cities.
Most people don’t know that many cities throughout the United States are already wired with "dark fiber": infrastructure that, for a variety of reasons, is never used to provide gigabit connections to actual residents. This fiber is often laid by companies you rarely hear about, like Zayo and Level 3, which lay fiber infrastructure in hopes the city, a provider like Google, or a corporate customer (like an office building) will eventually make use of it.
This can either be a really difficult process or an easy one, depending on local ordinances. San Francisco has made the laying of fiber infrastructure a priority since the early 2000s, and it appears to be paying off for its residents now.
"Google Fiber doesn’t go anywhere where they’re not going to have a strong partner and facilitator in the city," Joanne Hovis, who worked on a fiber feasibility study for the city of San Francisco in the late 2000s, told me. "There’s been an incredibly robust long term plan on the part of the city to encourage big bandwidth infrastructure that’s meaningful. Today’s announcement is a testament to the fact the city had some smooth processes around permitting and the other things necessary to complete the unbelievably complex task of building fiber in an urban area."
This existing infrastructure is what has made it easy for Google Fiber to move in. Google now only has to build the "last mile" connections that will go to apartment complexes and condos in the city. At least initially, Fiber won’t be available in individual rowhouses or single family homes, which typically cost more to connect on a per-account basis (the company gets more bang for its buck wiring an entire apartment complex or condo).
"Google is setting a precedent and demonstrating its willingness to offer its services over a network it doesn’t own," Hovis said. "That’s something we really haven’t seen in the broadband era. You don’t have to build a new network, you can leverage what’s already there and different providers can use different bundles in fiber strands to compete with each other."
"It remains to be seen whether private companies will overtake municipal efforts to cover San Francisco in fiber internet access to the home"
Google’s move to San Francisco is at least as interesting as its announcement earlier this week that it’ll be expanding to Huntsville, Alabama, and both represent a new model for broadband access in the United States and prove there are many models that might work moving forward.
In Huntsville, Google will lease a government-owned dark fiber network to offer internet connections. It’s telling that the company isn’t doing the same in San Francisco. Besides encouraging investment from private companies, San Francisco has invested heavily in its own fiber network that connects municipal buildings, schools, and housing projects. According to the San Francisco city government, there are at least 140 miles of "dark fiber" running underneath the city’s streets, and more than 256 municipal buildings have been connected.
A "dig once" ordinance passed in 2014 requires the city to lay its own fiber any time a road is dug up, whether its for a street repair, water main break, or power line renovations.
"The [since enacted] Dig Once legislation indicates a dedication to improving fiber access and lighting up the city’s dark fiber," Susan Crawford of Harvard’s Berkman Center wrote in 2014. "It remains to be seen whether private companies will overtake municipal efforts to cover San Francisco in fiber internet access to the home."
San Francisco does have a fiber leasing program, but I’ve been told that the city’s prices are not competitive. In 2014, I spoke with Alex Menendez, CEO of MonkeyBrains, a small ISP in San Francisco. He told me that the city of San Francisco never wanted to run fiber to individual apartment complexes itself, but that the city was interested in having a private company do it. MonkeyBrains wasn’t able to reach an agreement that would have allowed them to offer fiber internet for less than $200 per month.
"They don’t run a business and can’t figure out how to sell it, how to price it," Menendez told me. "We would love to do fiber to the home, but it doesn’t make sense for us to use the city’s at the current pricing."
Google obviously found it preferable to light up privately owned dark fiber infrastructure. It’ll be interesting to see whether Google or another company ever tries to make use of publicly owned fiber in San Francisco, and perhaps Google’s initial inroads in Fiber will eventually lead it toward using city-owned fiber.
Between the Huntsville announcement and the San Francisco ones, it’s clear that Google and other smaller ISP startups are looking to make use of existing fiber: Why bother laying your own infrastructure if you don’t have to? To cities, the message is clear: If you (or some other company) build it, the providers will come, eventually.
Hundreds of Cities Are Wired With Fiber
By Jason Koebler Jun 4 2014, 2:30am; Original article here
. . . But Telecom Lobbying Keeps It Unused
Government buildings all around the country are wired with fiber, but agreements with huge telecoms keep it out of people’s homes.
In light of the ongoing net neutrality battle, many people have begun looking to Google and its promise of high-speed fiber as a potential saving grace from companies that want to create an "internet fast lane." Well, the fact is, even without Google, many communities and cities throughout the country are already wired with fiber — they just don’t let their residents use it.
The reasons vary by city, but in many cases, the reason you can’t get gigabit internet speeds — without the threat of that service being provided by a company that wants to discriminate against certain types of traffic — is because of the giant telecom businesses that want to kill net neutrality in the first place.
Throughout the country, companies like Comcast, Time Warner Cable, CenturyLink, and Verizon have signed agreements with cities that prohibit local governments from becoming internet service providers and prohibit municipalities from selling or leasing their fiber to local startups who would compete with these huge corporations.
Because ISPs often double as cable and telephone companies, during contract negotiations with governments, they’ll often offer incentives to the government — such as better or faster service, earlier access to (their company’s) cable internet for residents, and the like — in exchange for a non-compete clause.
To be clear, these are often strictly local agreements between cities and cable giants.
In Washington DC, for instance, the country’s first 100 Gbps fiber network has been available to nonprofit organizations since 2006 — but not to any of the city’s residents. During a re-negotiation with Comcast in 1999 in which the company threatened to cut off cable service to the city, Comcast agreed to provide some of its fiber access to the city for the government’s "exclusive use."
"The 1999 agreement was conditioned in important ways," former Obama administration assistant and Harvard University researcher Susan Crawford wrote in a recent paper examining the city’s fiber network. "First, the city agreed not to lease or sell the fiber. Second, the contract required that the city not ‘engage in any activities or outcomes that would result in business competition between the District and Comcast or that may result in loss of business opportunity for Comcast.’"
Comcast never even made its fiber available to the city, but that agreement, and a future one with Verizon, has, in part, kept the city’s DC-NET fiber network out of residents’ homes.
"The intent was never to take the business away from Verizon or Comcast," Anil Sharma, director of operations for DC-NET, told Washington City Paper last year. "Our target audience always was community anchor institutions."
What happened in DC is not uncommon. According to MuniNetworks, a group that tracks community access to fiber nationwide, at least 20 states have laws or other regulatory barriers that make it illegal or difficult for communities to offer fiber access to their residents. Even in states where there are no official rules, non-compete agreements between government and big business are common.
What happens then are so-called "middle-mile" projects, where government buildings, schools, and nonprofit groups can be wired up, but expanded access to consumers is met with stiff lobbying opposition and threats from larger ISPs.
"A full fiber-to-the-premises model, on the other hand, might attract the attention of the entire national communications industry and related industries," New America Foundation researchers wrote in a May report called "The Art of the Possible: An Overview of Public Broadband Options."
"That is because the competition enabled by a high-capacity fiber-to-the-premises infrastructure would be perceived as a direct challenge to the interests of incumbent players in the current market structure."
There are, however, glimmers of hope.
Cities are beginning to see the importance of providing their residents with cheap, fast, and open broadband networks, and at least 89 cities and towns nationwide now offer fiber to their residents as a publicly owned utility. Patrick Lucey, one of the authors of the New America report, told me that the number of communities that actually offer fiber "doesn’t capture the amount of conversations and attention that broadband infrastructure is getting."
Officials in Chattanooga, TN, which offers gigabit fiber to more than 39,000 residents, said that they initially invested in fiber to "control their own destiny." Wilson, NC, a city of 50,000 people, offers the fastest internet speeds in the entire state and has noticed a population growth and a marked increase in the number of businesses relocating to and forming in the city.
"A lot of these small communities have decided to make the decision to try to try to keep young people from moving away and have decided to invest in this," Lucey said. "It’s not just about having broadband internet so you can watch Netflix, it’s about making sure schools and first responders have the bandwidth capabilities they need. To have libraries and hospitals wired up and to give residents the chance to take advantage of it."
Meanwhile, cities that are already wired up but don’t have restrictive agreements with a major ISP are looking for ways to lease or sell it off to smaller, local ISPs — but, unfortunately, the business model appears elusive in many places. Despite the fact that this fiber often exists in the ground, it’s expensive and cumbersome for a city — without the help of an ISP — to go the "last mile" to residents’ homes unless it has already planned to do so (though dozens have decided to do it on their own anyway, and have had success).
San Francisco’s average internet speeds don’t even rank in the top 100 municipalities in the country, but, like many other places, most of the city is wired with municipal fiber that’s used by government officials, police stations, and city colleges. In 2008, the city made some of that network available to low-rise public housing projects, but still doesn’t offer fiber to its other residents.
"We’ve met with them several times over the past three years, but they can’t figure out how to work with a local company," Alex Menendez, who helps run MonkeyBrains, a small ISP based in the city, told me. "They don’t run a business and can’t figure out how to sell it, how to price it. We would love to do fiber to the home, but it doesn’t make sense for us to use the city’s at the current pricing."
Menendez told me that, after paying what the city wants to charge, he’d have to sell fiber access to customers at $200 a month just to break even.
Instead, the company is trying a pilot program with the city to offer fiber to businesses in certain office buildings. The plan is to build an "island of fiber" in seven buildings in the city — but he doesn’t see the company, or the city for that matter, offering up fiber to its residents.
It’s not for a lack of interest. I asked him if more people have signed up since the FCC offered up its plan to create an internet "fast lane."
"It’s definitely picked up. It’s been a steady flow — we have more business than we’re staffed for, and we have more business than we can do," he said. "These folks care about net neutrality, and our customers like being able to call a number and talk to someone who really controls a good size of the business."
Unfortunately, those people — and millions of others around the country — will have to settle for Internet speeds that are relatively run-of-the-mill, while tons of unused fiber sits beneath them.