Adapted from an ARS Technica article by Jon Brodkin, 7/31/18 | Original article here
AT&T and Verizon have generally built fiber only where they face competition.
You already knew that home broadband competition is sorely lacking through much of the US. Much of this misery was created because our State Public Telecom Utilities (controlled by AT&T, Verizon, CenturyLink and Frontier) failed us:
Since the mid-1990’s, these State Public Telecom Utilities collected tens of billions of dollars from landline customers for the express purpose of upgrading copper Wirelines to Fiber Optic Wirelines.
The parent/holding companies of these State Public Telecom Utilities — AT&T, Verizon, CenturyLink and Frontier — pocketed the money, but never delivered the promised Fiber Optic service.
The parent/holding companies fraudulently transferred these funds from these State Public Telecom Utilities to their private Wireless subsidiaries to build out 4G/LTE.
This fraud has been well-documented at the FCC for decades, but the FCC functions as a branch office of AT&T and Verizon and the FCC aids and abets this fraud of the American people.
US Population Offered ISP Service by Telcos
(millions of people)
|Telco ISP||Total||DSL||Fiber||% Fiber|
The telcos have mostly avoided upgrading their copper networks to fiber —except in areas where they face competition from cable companies. These details are in "Profiles of Monopoly: Big Cable and Telecom," a report by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR). The full report is available at this link.
The report, released today from the Institute for Local Self Reliance (ILSR), helps shed more light on Americans who have just one choice for high-speed Internet.
Comcast is the only choice for 30 million Americans when it comes to broadband speeds of at least 25Mbps downstream and 3Mbps upstream, the report says.
Charter Communications is the only choice for 38 million Americans.
Combined, Comcast and Charter offer service in the majority of the US, with almost no overlap.
Yet, many Americans are even worse off, living in areas where DSL is the best option. AT&T, Verizon, and other telcos still provide only sub-broadband speeds over copper wires throughout huge parts of their territories.
The Broadband Market is Broken
The report’s conclusion states:
"The broadband market is broken. Comcast and Charter maintain a monopoly over 68 million people. Some
48 million households (about 122 million people) get their broadband from these two cable companies,
31.6 million households (about 80.3 million people) get their broadband from the four largest telecom companies combined.
The large telecom companies have largely abandoned rural America — their DSL networks overwhelmingly do not support broadband speeds—despite years of federal subsidies and many state grant programs."
The ILSR report is based on the Federal Communications Commission’s Form 477 data; ISPs are required to identify the census blocks in which they provide residential or business Internet service and the maximum speeds offered in each block.
The Form 477 data "overestimates actual broadband availability and ISPs’ service areas," because it counts an entire census block as served even if an ISP offers service to just one resident in the block, the report notes. But the ILSR said it found no better alternative, and ISPs have resisted efforts to make the data more accurate.
The report includes deployment data for cable, fiber, DSL, and fixed wireless broadband. The report excludes satellite Internet "because the technology is highly dependent on terrain and weather, has very poor latency, and is often more expensive than terrestrial ISPs." Mobile broadband also is not included because the report focuses on home (or "fixed") Internet service, rather than smartphone coverage.
The most recent Form 477 data is from December 2016, so the numbers in this article aren’t fully up to date. As we’ve reported, the data showed that 30 percent of developed census blocks have just one ISP offering speeds at least as fast as the FCC’s broadband standard of 25Mbps downloads and 3Mbps uploads. In 1
Comcast and Charter
Comcast, the nation’s biggest cable company and broadband provider, offers service to about 110 million people in 39 states and Washington, DC.
"All of these people have access to broadband-level service through Comcast Xfinity, but about 30 million of these people have no other option for broadband service," the ILSR wrote.
Comcast’s broadband subscribers included 25.5 million households, or about 64.8 million people, based on the average US household size of 2.54 people.
Charter, the second biggest cable company after Comcast, offers service to 101 million people in 45 states. 22.5 million households covering about 57.2 million people were subscribing to Charter Internet, according to the numbers cited by the ILSR.
Like Comcast, Charter offers broadband-level speeds throughout its territory. "About 38 million [people in Charter territory] have no other option for broadband service," the report said.
Comcast and Charter generally don’t compete against each other. They have a combined territory covering about 210 million people, yet the companies’ overlapping service territory covers only about 1.5 million people, according to the Form 477 data cited by the ILSR. The overlap is mostly in Florida, where Charter purchased Bright House Networks, and may be overstated because an entire census block is counted as served even if an ISP offers service to just one resident in the block.
AT&T, Verizon, and Other Telcos
The numbers look a lot different when you switch from cable to DSL and fiber providers. AT&T is the biggest such provider. AT&T offers Internet service to 122.5 million people in 21 states. But nearly all of that is DSL or fiber-to-the-node, as AT&T offers fiber-to-the-home to just 7.8 million people as of the December 2016 data, the ILSR report said.
The report continues:
"About 53.7 percent of people (65.8 million) in the total service area have access to broadband-level service through AT&T. Of these people, 745,000 have no other option for broadband service. The data suggests that AT&T has almost exclusively upgraded its networks to offer broadband-level service only in areas where it faces competition."
In other words, AT&T has installed fiber or at least broadband-level speeds in many areas where it competes against cable companies, but it generally hasn’t bothered to do so in areas without competition.
Verizon offers Internet service to 55.2 million people. "The DSL service area covers 47.7 million people, but the FTTH (fiber-to-the-home) service area covers 33.3 million people," with significant overlap, the report said.
About 33.5 million people have access to broadband speeds from Verizon. Of those, "approximately 185,000 people have no other option for broadband service," the report says. "This means that FiOS has almost exclusively been deployed to areas where it faces cable competition." Verizon had 7 million households subscribing to its Internet service.
The report also covers CenturyLink and Frontier. CenturyLink offers Internet service to 49.1 million people, but its fiber-to-the-home service is only available to 3.8 million.
The report said:
"About 47.9 percent of people (23.5 million) in the total service area have access to broadband-level service through CenturyLink and approximately 1 million people have no other option for broadband service."
CenturyLink’s subscribers include about 5 million households covering about 12.7 million people.
Frontier’s offers Internet service to 30 million people, while its fiber-to-the-home territory is available to 10 million people.
The report said:
"About 38.7 percent of people (12.6 million) in this service area have access to broadband-level service through Frontier. Approximately 59,000 people have no other option for broadband service. These data suggest that Frontier has invested in faster services almost solely where it faces competition and not in more rural areas."
Profiles of Monopoly: Big Cable & Telecom
MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. — Despite receiving billions in federal funding to help rural Americans access the internet, the biggest telecom companies have focused investment on urban areas, leaving rural communities with DSL that the cannot meet the Federal Communication Commission’s broadband definition. In the latest policy brief, the Institute for Local Self Reliance (ILSR) mapped out broadband availability by six of the largest Internet Service Providers (ISPs): Comcast, Charter, AT&T, CenturyLink, Frontier, and Verizon. The resulting maps and analysis illustrate where broadband service is available across the U.S. from each of the six ISPs and where each faces competition.
Our researchers found that despite the federal subsidy program for high-cost rural areas (called the Connect America Fund), these providers have invested the bare minimum to comply with requirements while more significantly upgrading urban markets. Meanwhile, cooperatives and local ISPs that have received far fewer subsidies have invested much more in rural communities.
This finding demonstrates a critical point: investment in broadband networks is driven more by competition than by other policies to induce investment, such as providing subsidies to these large firms. The federal government is spending billions of dollars for millions of homes in the service territories of AT&T, CenturyLink, and others — but the vast majority of those homes still will not have broadband after the checks are cashed.
Christopher Mitchell, director of the Community Broadband Networks initiative at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance:
“It’s galling to see the billions wasted on those big companies when we know that local providers would provide better connections to millions more homes at a fraction of the public expenditure. The big monopolies have utterly failed rural America while remaining the darlings of the DC Beltway.”
If you’re interested in gaining perspective on broadband monopolies and community broadband networks from Christopher Mitchell, please schedule an interview through Hibba Meraay at 612-844-1330.