Sept 30, 2020 — Key Asks
- Repeal HB.2365: Streamline WTF Deployment Bill
- Local regulation of "safety of life and property" (link)
- Set power output limits of WTFs to that which provides 5 bars" telecommunications service (and no higher)
- Perform Wireless Antenna Needs Test for new WTFs
- Implement Wired internet access for safe, fast and secure data transmissions (FTTP = Fiber to the Premises)
Tucson, AZ — Sept 30, 2020 — AZ State Rep. Hannley re: 4G/5G WTF Infrastructure Zoominar
Rep. Pamela Powers Hannley |
Russell Witte, PhD |
---|---|
|
|
Rep. Domingo DeGrazia |
Lois Pawlak |
---|---|
|
|
Russell Witte, PhD Slides — September 30, 2020
Watch the slide show below or download the pdf here.
Arizona 4G/5G WTF Infrastructure Notes
Key Asks
- Repeal HB.2365: Streamline WTF Deployment Bill
- Local regulation of "safety of life and property" (link)
- Set power output limits of WTFs to that which provides 5 bars" telecommunications service (and no higher)
- Perform Wireless Antenna Needs Test for new WTFs
- Implement Wired internet access for safe, fast and secure data transmissions (FTTP = Fiber to the Premises)
A. Rep. Pamela Powers Hannley (2 mins)
- This was a two-minute repeat of the video on her blog
- She stands for local control of WTFs and actually closing the Digital Divide
B. Dr. Russell Witte (30 mins): Health Effects of Densified 4G/5G Infrastructure
-
Parallel of Wireless advertising and smoking advertising
-
Special properties of wavelengths in microwave spectrum
-
Bjørn Nordenstrom, MD Discover Magazine "Electric Man"; Robert Becker, MD The Body Electric
-
The Microwave Debate (1984) Nicholas H. Steneck, Allen Frey vs Herman Schwan
-
Wave Properties: Frequency, Amplitude, Intensity, Pulsation, Modulation, Radiation Pattern, Polarity
-
Dose is ignored by FCC Guideline — what about cumulative exposure?
-
20,000+ studies and research sponsorship bias (Lai 2008)
-
IMHO, Too many science details from 13:30 to 23:30
-
Last ten minutes: Arizona at a crossroads. You said "600 to 800 MHz is still 4G" . . . not exactly, T-Mobile 5G is 600 MHz & 2500MHz, AT&T 5G is at 850 MHz
-
At 23:20 I see you reached the stuff we discussed. Good job. This could have come earlier.
-
At 25:10 you said "47 U.S.C Sect. 332’s ‘promote the safety of life and property’ was in the 1934 Communications Act, which had a similar statement of purpose
"a rapid, efficient, Nation-wide, and world-wide wire and radio communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges,
-
for the purpose of the national defense,
-
for the purpose of promoting safety of life and property"
Parallel of Wireless advertising and smoking advertising
Special properties of wavelengths in microwave spectrum
Bjørn Nordenstrom, MD Discover Magazine "Electric Man"; Robert Becker, MD The Body Electric
The Microwave Debate (1984) Nicholas H. Steneck, Allen Frey vs Herman Schwan
Wave Properties: Frequency, Amplitude, Intensity, Pulsation, Modulation, Radiation Pattern, Polarity
Dose is ignored by FCC Guideline — what about cumulative exposure?
20,000+ studies and research sponsorship bias (Lai 2008)
IMHO, Too many science details from 13:30 to 23:30
Last ten minutes: Arizona at a crossroads. You said "600 to 800 MHz is still 4G" . . . not exactly, T-Mobile 5G is 600 MHz & 2500MHz, AT&T 5G is at 850 MHz
At 23:20 I see you reached the stuff we discussed. Good job. This could have come earlier.
At 25:10 you said "47 U.S.C Sect. 332’s ‘promote the safety of life and property’ was in the 1934 Communications Act, which had a similar statement of purpose
"a rapid, efficient, Nation-wide, and world-wide wire and radio communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges,
-
for the purpose of the national defense,
-
for the purpose of promoting safety of life and property"
. . . which Congress reaffirmed in the 1996 Amendment:
"(a) Factors which Commission must consider (1) promote the safety of life and property"
-
The asks were at 28:45:
-
Repeal HB.2365: Streamline WTF Deployment Bill
-
Local regulation of "safety of life and property" (link)
-
Set power output limits of WTFs to that which provides 5 bars" telecommunications service (and no higher)
-
Perform Wireless Antenna Needs Test for new WTFs
-
Implement Wired internet access for safe, fast and secure data transmissions (FTTP = Fiber to the Premises)
-
Links for Legislators:
-
C. Rep. Domingo DeGrazia on Privacy (8 mins)
- Nation-state actors . . . only them? No domestic sources raping us for our data/privacy?
- Huawei only . . . really? What about the fundamental security flaw that was never corrected with 3G/4G and is being repeated with 5G in non-Huawei equipment, explained here –> https://scientists4wiredtech.com/3g-4g-5g-national-security-failure/ and exploitation by US-based companies?
D. Lois Pawlak (20 mins) –> https://youtu.be/8M-Nm-r6EBo
-
Residents (stakeholders) are cut out of the administrative process; City is not running so-called "small" Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (sWTFs) through a separate permit process
-
7,000 residents in one square mile; information is being systematically hidden from residents by the City of Tuscon
-
Installers dug the wrong hole and residents lost parking during a three-month long construction project; the installers dumping gravel on the hole does not match the existing sidewalk; trip hazards on the ground
-
Projected: 30,000 towers from just AT&T
-
Putting in front of homes in NOT the least intrusive means for locating WTFs, leading to deteorioating home values
-
Residents have to police the contractors; we have no supervision and no one to call
-
Contractors work on weekends out outside of 8:00 am to 5:00 pm
-
Electrical equipment is being installed in a water retention basin ($500,000 federally-funded vegetation installation)
E. Q&A (20 mins)
-
Despite what Domingo DeGrazia says, data you contribute from your devices does not have an end date for storage for surveillance, which he completely ignores.
-
Oct 20 study session for Steve Kozachik, Tucson City Council Ward 6 says here is an Oct 20 study session
-
Paul Stapleton-Smith, AFL-CIO: wants to move toward municipal broadband as a public utility . . . but wireline broadband and wireless broadband are not functionally equivalent services
-
Home run answer re: wired technology by Russell Witte
Top Five Links to Share with Arizona Legislators
- https://ourtownourchoice.org/glenellyn/il-hb-5818-to-give-local-governments-a-say-in-densified-4g-5g-wireless-grid/#swtf
- https://ourtownourchoice.org/wewantit/
- https://scientists4wiredtech.com/readinglaw/
- https://scientists4wiredtech.com/campanelli/
- https://scientists4wiredtech.com/3g-4g-5g-national-security-failure/
You must be logged in to post a comment.